Some links on this page are affiliate links. If you sign up after clicking one we may earn a commission, at no extra cost to you — and it never affects how we rank or rate anything. How this site is funded.
A difficulty label is the single most useful word on a course page. It answers the only question that decides whether you can do the course at all: can I start this on Monday, or do I need something else first? It is also, on two of the three biggest platforms, not quite the thing you think it is.
Where we would start
The track this page's own test passes cleanly: the badge says Beginner, all five required courses are entry-level, and none of them assumes a language. If you want the version of “beginner” that survives reading the syllabus rather than the label, it is this one.
Quick answer
"Beginner" on a course page usually means "this is the entry point into this topic" — not "you can arrive with no relevant skills". Those are different claims, and on a technical track they can be separated by several months of prerequisite study. The reliable check takes about thirty seconds: ignore the badge and look at the first required course. If the first thing in the syllabus assumes a language or a library, the track is not a beginner's route no matter what the badge says.
Why the badge is not the fact you want
A provider is labelling the course's position in its own catalogue. Within a deep-learning catalogue, the gentlest deep-learning track is reasonably called the beginner one — relative to the other deep-learning tracks. That is an honest label and a useless one for a reader who has never written a line of Python, because the comparison set was never people like them.
This is not a criticism of any provider's integrity. It is a mismatch between what the label means to the person writing it and what it means to the person reading it. But the consequence lands entirely on the reader, who enrols, reaches lesson one, and finds it opens on scikit-learn.
DataCamp: the badge and the courses disagree, in both directions
DataCamp publishes two different difficulty numbers, and they are not on the same scale. A track carries one figure; each course inside that track carries another. Reading the first as if it described the second is how a track that assumes Python ends up labelled for people who do not have it.
Five DataCamp tracks, with the level DataCamp's own badge implies beside the level its required courses actually support. Two disagree, and they disagree in opposite directions — which is why the badge alone cannot be trusted either way.
| Track | Provider badge | Required course levels | Our published level |
|---|---|---|---|
| AI Fundamentals | Beginner | 1, 1, 1, 1, 1 | Beginner — agrees |
| Data Analyst in Python | Beginner | 1, 1, 1, 1, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2 | Beginner — agrees |
| Machine Learning Fundamentals in Python | Beginner | 2, 2, 2, 3 | Intermediate — harder |
| Deep Learning in Python | Beginner | 2, 2, 3, 3, 3 | Intermediate — harder |
| EU AI Act Fundamentals | Intermediate | 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1 | Beginner — easier |
The one that would actually hurt you
Machine Learning Fundamentals in Python is badged Beginner. Its first required course is Supervised Learning with scikit-learn, and the track contains no introductory Python course anywhere in it. A reader with no Python who takes the badge at face value is being pointed at scikit-learn, PyTorch and reinforcement learning as a starting point. We publish it as Intermediate — harder than the provider's own badge — for that reason alone.
The one that would wrongly put you off
The error runs the other way too, and it costs readers something different. EU AI Act Fundamentals is badged Intermediate. All six of its required courses are entry-level, it lists no prerequisite tracks, and it involves no coding — the track description addresses business professionals. Telling a lawyer or a compliance officer that this is "Intermediate" would deter exactly the person it was built for. We publish it as Beginner.
Both disagreements are deliberate and both are recorded in our catalogue with the reasoning attached, so anyone can check the working rather than take our word for it.
Not sure this is the right one for you?
Answer a few questions about your background and what you want the certificate to do, and the picker narrows it to one recommendation — from the same vetted list this page ranks from.
Try the AI Certification Picker →When the badge is right — and how to tell
Two of the five tracks above are labelled correctly, and the difference is visible in one glance. Data Analyst in Python is badged Beginner and genuinely starts at Introduction to Python before ramping to intermediate work. AI Fundamentals is badged Beginner and every required course is entry-level with no coding at all.
So the test is not "is the badge trustworthy" — it is "does the first required course start where I am?" A beginner track that opens on an introduction is a beginner track. A beginner track that opens on a library is a beginner track for people who already know the language.
Coursera and Udemy label different things again
Coursera states a level on the course page, and we publish a harder level than Coursera does on three of the programmes we rate. A credential that expects Python you are assumed to already have is not a beginner credential because the marketing page says Beginner. We keep both figures — theirs and ours — and where they differ, the disagreement is the point rather than an error to reconcile.
Udemy has no consistent level taxonomy at all: the level is whatever the instructor typed. Two courses labelled "All Levels" can be an hour of overview and a forty-hour bootcamp. On Udemy the label carries close to no information, and the running time and the syllabus carry all of it.
How to check any course in thirty seconds
- Open the syllabus, not the badge. Find the first required module or course.
- Read its title as a sentence about you. "Introduction to Python" starts from zero. "Supervised Learning with scikit-learn" does not — it assumes the language and the environment.
- Look for a prerequisites line. If the track lists prerequisite tracks, the badge is describing the topic, not your readiness.
- Check the description's first sentence. Phrases like "if you're familiar with traditional machine learning" are the honest prerequisite, stated in prose where the badge could not fit it.
- Treat stated hours as a floor. A course assuming skills you lack does not take longer; it stops being finishable.
We published this wrong ourselves
This page exists because of our own error, and it would be dishonest to present it as something we spotted from the outside. Until 27 August 2026 this site published Machine Learning Fundamentals in Python as Beginner on eight pages, because we had transcribed the provider's badge instead of reading the required courses underneath it. Readers with no Python were being sent to a scikit-learn track by us, not just by the badge.
Every level we publish now records the required courses' levels and the reasoning behind our judgement, and an automated check refuses to let a published level drift from that record. That is the only reason we can show you the table above: we had to build the audit to correct ourselves first.
What this means when you are choosing
If you have no coding background, the labels most likely to mislead you are on technical tracks in the topics you are most drawn to — machine learning and deep learning specifically, because those catalogues are deep enough that their gentlest entry is still not gentle. Start instead where the first course is an introduction to something, and treat any track whose opening module names a library as requiring the language that library is written in.
If you are already technical, the risk inverts: a track badged Intermediate because of its subject matter — governance, regulation, AI for business — may be entirely accessible and is often wrongly skipped by people who would finish it in a weekend.
Ready to start?
Included in a DataCamp subscription rather than bought outright, so the cost is what you pay while you are working through it — which is an argument for finishing.
Frequently asked questions
Is DataCamp's "Beginner" badge wrong?
Not wrong, but it answers a different question than most readers think. The badge marks the entry point into a topic within DataCamp's own catalogue, not suitability for someone with no relevant background. Of the five tracks we audited, three badges matched what the required courses support and two did not — one understating the difficulty and one overstating it. The badge is a starting hint; the required courses are the fact.
How do I know if a course needs Python before I enrol?
Look at the first required course in the syllabus. If it names a library — scikit-learn, PyTorch, pandas, TensorFlow — the course assumes you can already write the language that library is used from. If the first course is an introduction to the language itself, the track starts from zero. A track that contains no introductory language course anywhere, but teaches libraries throughout, is assuming Python silently.
Why do your difficulty levels sometimes disagree with the provider's?
Because we are answering the reader's question rather than describing our own catalogue. We rate three Coursera programmes harder than Coursera does, and two DataCamp tracks differently from their badges — one harder, one easier. Each disagreement is recorded with the evidence: the required courses' own levels, whether prerequisites are listed, and whether coding is involved. Where we agree with a provider, we say so too.
Does "All Levels" on Udemy mean anything?
Very little. Udemy's level is set by the instructor with no consistent taxonomy behind it, so two courses marked "All Levels" can be a one-hour overview and a forty-hour bootcamp. On Udemy, read the total running time and the section list instead — those are structural facts about the course rather than a self-assessment.
Can a course be too easy rather than too hard?
Yes, and it is the more common waste of money among people who already work in tech. A track badged Intermediate for its subject matter — AI governance, regulation, AI for business — often requires no technical background at all and gets skipped by exactly the people who would finish it quickly. Check the required courses before dismissing something as beneath you, the same way you would before assuming it is beyond you.